[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB3A4DA.90309@ce.jp.nec.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:18:50 +0900
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC: David Strand <dpstrand@...il.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] block: blk_set_default_limits sets 0 to max_sectors
max_sectors and max_hw_sectors of dm device are set to smaller values
than those of underlying devices. E.g:
# cat /sys/block/sdj/queue/max_sectors_kb
512
# cat /sys/block/sdj/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb
32767
# echo "0 10 linear /dev/sdj 0" | dmsetup create test
# cat /sys/block/dm-0/queue/max_sectors_kb
127
# cat /sys/block/dm-0/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb
127
This prevents the I/O size of struct request from becoming large,
and causes undesired request fragmentation in request-based dm.
This is caused by the queue_limits stacking.
In dm_calculate_queue_limits(), the block-layer's safe default value
(SAFE_MAX_SECTORS, 255) is included in the merging process of target's
queue_limits. So underlying queue_limits is not propagated correctly.
Initialize default values of all max_sectors to '0'
in blk_set_default_limits() so that the values propagate properly
from underlying devices.
Check this thread for further background:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-September/msg00176.html
Signed-off-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Reported-by: David Strand <dpstrand@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
---
block/blk-settings.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.31.work/block/blk-settings.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.work.orig/block/blk-settings.c
+++ linux-2.6.31.work/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue
lim->max_hw_segments = MAX_HW_SEGMENTS;
lim->seg_boundary_mask = BLK_SEG_BOUNDARY_MASK;
lim->max_segment_size = MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE;
- lim->max_sectors = lim->max_hw_sectors = SAFE_MAX_SECTORS;
+ lim->max_sectors = lim->max_hw_sectors = 0;
lim->logical_block_size = lim->physical_block_size = lim->io_min = 512;
lim->bounce_pfn = (unsigned long)(BLK_BOUNCE_ANY >> PAGE_SHIFT);
lim->alignment_offset = 0;
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ void blk_queue_make_request(struct reque
q->unplug_timer.data = (unsigned long)q;
blk_set_default_limits(&q->limits);
+ blk_queue_max_sectors(q, SAFE_MAX_SECTORS);
/*
* If the caller didn't supply a lock, fall back to our embedded
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists