[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090918185425.GA16620@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:54:25 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fei <at.wufei@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, arjan@...radead.org,
jeremy@...p.org, mschmidt@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] kthreads: simplify !kthreadd_task logic, kill
kthreadd_task_init_done
On 09/19, Wu Fei wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:37:49AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Lets delay this until i can debug it more fully.
> >
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY looks like the key of this problem,
> might_resched becomes _cond_resched, and since d86ee480 changes
> it not to check SYSTEM_RUNNING,
... and should_resched() is true under preempt_disable()
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -452,10 +452,10 @@ static noinline void __init_refok rest_init(void)
> int pid;
>
> rcu_scheduler_starting();
> - kernel_thread(kernel_init, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_SIGHAND);
> - numa_default_policy();
> pid = kernel_thread(kthreadd, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES);
> kthreadd_task = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns);
> + kernel_thread(kernel_init, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_SIGHAND);
We can't do this. kernel_init() should run with ->pid == 1, we are
going to exec /sbin/init.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists