[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090918203040.GA6031@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:30:40 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Add blk_queue_copy_limits()
On Fri, Sep 18 2009 at 3:28pm -0400,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Jun'ichi" == Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com> writes:
>
> + if (q->limits.max_sectors == 0 || q->limits.max_hw_sectors == 0)
> + blk_queue_max_sectors(q, SAFE_MAX_SECTORS);
>
> I'm really not keen on perpetuating SAFE_MAX_SECTORS for something that
> was written in this millennium.
>
> I'd much rather we just do this, then:
>
> block: Set max_sectors correctly for stacking devices
>
> The topology changes unintentionally caused SAFE_MAX_SECTORS to be set
> for stacking devices. Set the default limit to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS and
> provide SAFE_MAX_SECTORS in blk_queue_make_request() for legacy hw
> drivers that depend on the old behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Nice. Avoids the need for a safe queue_limits copy and associated naunce.
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists