[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090917.223723.07032792.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc64 pcpu failures...
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Tejun, I just started seeing the following on sparc64:
>
> [ 56.422005] WARNING: at mm/vmalloc.c:1991 pcpu_get_vm_areas+0x1b4/0x5fc()
...
> Might this be a result of:
>
> commit bcb2107fdbecef3de55d597d23453747af81ba88
> Author: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri Aug 14 15:00:53 2009 +0900
>
> sparc64: use embedding percpu first chunk allocator
>
> sparc64 currently allocates a large page for each cpu and partially
> remap them into vmalloc area much like what lpage first chunk
> allocator did. As a 4M page is used for each cpu, this results in
> very large unit size and also adds TLB pressure due to the double
> mapping of pages in the first chunk.
>
> This patch converts sparc64 to use the embedding percpu first chunk
> allocator which now knows how to handle NUMA configurations. This
> simplifies the code a lot, doesn't incur any extra TLB pressure and
> results in better utilization of address space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> Do you think?
I've verified that reverting this makes the problem go away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists