linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/20] mem_class: use minor as index instead of searching the array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:17:22 +0200
From:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
CC:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] mem_class: use minor as index instead of searching
  the array

Am 15.09.2009 23:26 schrieb Daniel Walker:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 14:20 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 
>> I'll gladly do that, it's trival for me to do so.
>>
> 
> What about the other side ? The people who are sending the clean ups,
> there time is valuable too..

Do such people really exist? Nobody ever sent a cleanup patch for any
of the numerous checkpatch errors in drivers/isdn/gigaset. I only get
complaints about them when I submit a patch that touches one of the
affected lines.

SCNR
T.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (255 bytes)