linux-kernel - Re: circular locking dependency detected panic in filldir when CONFIG_PROVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090919173948.GE5366@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:39:48 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: circular locking dependency detected panic in filldir when
	CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 09:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:15 -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> > > > I experienced a might_fault panic from NFS's use of filldir
> > > > in a 2.6.31 kernel compiled with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y.
> > > > 
> > > > Looking at filldir, I see it is accessing user space with
> > > > __put_dir's (which are inatomic) and with one copy_to_user
> > > > (which is not inatomic).  It is the single copy_to_user
> > > > which is causing the might_fault panic.
> > > > 
> > > > It doesn't make any sense to be mixing use of inatomic
> > > > and non-inatomic services in filldir.  Either all should be
> > > > the inatomic version, or none should be.
> > > > 
> > > > The might_fault condition being reported by the panic looks
> > > > real to me, so I suspect the wrong answer is converting
> > > > everything to the inatomic version, since that just
> > > > suppresses the circular dependency check while leaving
> > > > the circular dependency in place.
> > > 
> > > Yes. This is known... Please see 
> > >    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/28578
> > > and
> > >    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/27406
> > > 
> > > I'm still hoping the VM folks can see fit to merge Peter's fix at some
> > > point...
> > 
> > Ouch, those patches at:
> > 
> >   http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/mmap-vs-nfs/
> > 
> > .... are 2 years old. Higher intensity prodding needed to get this 
> > moving?
> 
> No I just need to find a way to clone() myself :-)

I did not mean to prod you :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/