linux-kernel - Re: performance counter for linux question.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090919080114.GA7676@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:01:14 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	sebastien cabaniols <sebastien.cabaniols@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: performance counter for linux question.


* sebastien cabaniols <sebastien.cabaniols@...com> wrote:

> Hello list,
> 
> I am interested by monitoring instructions versus cycles with a Nehalem box 
> using 2.6.31 with PCL.
> 
> Is there a way with perf report to display both counters ?
> 
> I used
> 
> perf record -e cycles -e instructions -a  for the recording session.
> 
> perf report -n seems to be doing what I need but for only one counter.
> 
> Is this a limitation of perf report ? 
> Is this an architectural limitation of PCL ?
> Is there more documentation than what is in the perf directory in the 2.6.31 
> tarball ?

You can find a description and a tutorial here:

  http://lwn.net/Articles/339361/

There's also http://perf.wiki.kernel.org.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/