[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090920081550.GA830@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:15:50 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Bityutskiy Artem <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Koskinen Aaro <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Pass IFSR register to do_PrefetchAbort()
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:03:16PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:55:42PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > It needed for proper prefetch abort handling on ARMv7.
>
> I think the only thing which is missing is an explaination about why
> this is desirable given that only later CPUs can give this additional
> information.
So you've posted it to the patch system, without further discussion here.
I think the solution is wrong - it makes instruction permission faults
unnecessarily noisy, which is not what the decoding table is supposed
to be doing. The decoding table's bad entries are there to catch those
_unexpected_ cases.
Instead, I suggest that you have a look at this:
if (fsr & (1 << 11)) /* write? */
mask = VM_WRITE;
else
mask = VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_WRITE;
fault = VM_FAULT_BADACCESS;
if (!(vma->vm_flags & mask))
goto out;
in __do_page_fault - if we are handling a prefetch abort, we really only
want to check that the VMA has VM_EXEC permission, not that it can be
read and written as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists