lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090921091759.GF4649@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:17:59 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Always show Cpus_allowed field in /proc/<pid>/status.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:06:27AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> +void task_cpus_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)

sigh. This should have been static.. updated patch below.


Subject: [PATCH] Always show Cpus_allowed fields in /proc/<pid>/status.

From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>

The Cpus_allowed fields in /proc/<pid>/status is currently only shown in
case of CONFIG_CPUSETS. However their contents are also useful for the
!CONFIG_CPUSETS case.
So change the current behaviour and always show these fields.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
---
 fs/proc/array.c |   11 +++++++++++
 kernel/cpuset.c |    8 +-------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/array.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -321,6 +321,16 @@ static inline void task_context_switch_c
 			p->nivcsw);
 }
 
+static void task_cpus_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed:\t");
+	seq_cpumask(m, &task->cpus_allowed);
+	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+	seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed_list:\t");
+	seq_cpumask_list(m, &task->cpus_allowed);
+	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+}
+
 int proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 			struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
 {
@@ -335,6 +345,7 @@ int proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, 
 	}
 	task_sig(m, task);
 	task_cap(m, task);
+	task_cpus_allowed(m, task);
 	cpuset_task_status_allowed(m, task);
 #if defined(CONFIG_S390)
 	task_show_regs(m, task);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/cpuset.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2499,15 +2499,9 @@ const struct file_operations proc_cpuset
 };
 #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_PID_CPUSET */
 
-/* Display task cpus_allowed, mems_allowed in /proc/<pid>/status file. */
+/* Display task mems_allowed in /proc/<pid>/status file. */
 void cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed:\t");
-	seq_cpumask(m, &task->cpus_allowed);
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
-	seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed_list:\t");
-	seq_cpumask_list(m, &task->cpus_allowed);
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
 	seq_printf(m, "Mems_allowed:\t");
 	seq_nodemask(m, &task->mems_allowed);
 	seq_printf(m, "\n");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ