linux-kernel - Influence of optimization level, preemption and scheduler on boot time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090921232553.c97560c7.buchner.johannes@gmx.at>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:25:53 +1200
From:	Johannes Buchner <buchner.johannes@....at>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Influence of optimization level, preemption and scheduler on boot
 time

Hi all.

I measured the kernel (and system) boot times while varying the
parameters:
 - Optimization level: -Os, -O2 and also -O3
 - Preemptive model
 - Scheduler: CFQ, Anticipatory, Deadline, Noop

My conclusion was that the optimization level and the preemptive model
had no significant influence on speed. CFQ let my system boot several
seconds faster than the other schedulers.

Graphs can be found at:
http://johannes.jakeapp.com/blog/?p=913

This conclusion may not be true for all situations, but I found it
interesting that the optimization level is so irrelevant.

Cheers,
Johannes

(I am not subscribed to the list.)
-- 
Emails können geändert, gefälscht und eingesehen werden. Signiere oder
verschüssele deine Mails mit GPG.
http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0625457/pgp.html

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped