[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253536939.2630.3.camel@frodo>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:42:19 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: TRACE_EVENT_ABI ?
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 09:36 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ingo suggested to make a TRACE_EVENT_ABI, which is equivalent in
> implementation to TRACE_EVENT, except that it signals a stable
> interface.
>
> In trying to implement this I'm running into a wall where TRACE_EVENT
> keeps being defined in many different ways all over the place, making
> this a really nasty hack to make it just an alias.
>
> Do you have any clever ideas on how to make this an alias without
> fouling up the whole tracing system?
I don't know what you've done so far, but can't you simply in
tracepoint.h define:
#define TRACE_EVENT_API(a,b,c,d,e) TRACE_EVENT(a,b,c,d,e)
And every time TRACE_EVENT_API is used, it will simply do whatever
TRACE_EVENT is at that time?
I've done similar tricks with other code.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists