[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0909210710h5bb75bcdwb666b51a9155a70a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:17 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, agruen@...e.de, hch@....de,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: fix d_path() for unreachable paths
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:02, Al Viro wrote:
> * blackfin cplbinfo: utter crap; it's used to decide which procfs file
> is being opened - by dumping full pathname into a (on-stack) buffer
> and then parsing it. Stupid *and* broken.
it works without having to copy & paste the same exact structures over
and over. a suggestion as how to do it cleanly without bloating the
code is certainly welcome. it doesnt really matter that it's on the
stack as the usage is small and d_path() is given the size of the
buffer, so it isnt going to overflow.
> * blackfin traps.c:decode_address(): for one thing, pathnames has been
> known to be longer than 256 bytes.
we know the paths are longer than 256 bytes. the output is to give a
reasonable idea of what is crashing. realistically, nothing
executable resides in a 256+ byte path on an embedded system.
> For another... locking in that loop
> over processes and VMAs of each looks very suspicios, while we are at it.
we've reviewed it several times and exercised it in multiple ways. so
unless you have a real idea of something being wrong, the code has
been vetted heavily.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists