linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090921140848.444528343@chello.nl>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:08:48 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses


Hi David,

based on your vmalloc code, an alternative implementation that lets x86 stay
with regular allocations.

While I'm sad to have to propose having two implementations around, I see no
other way to please both sides.

Alternative to placing the code in arch/sparc we could do something like

CONFIG_PERF_WANTS_VMALLOC and place both somewhere in kernel/



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/