linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] arch/um: remove duplicate structure field initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <CCABB2CC-E9F7-4153-8B60-85619DE71A13@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:26:44 +0200
From:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, jdike@...toit.com,
	user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arch/um: remove duplicate structure field initialization

> "
> The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each
> initializer provided for a particular subobject overriding any
> previously listed initializer for the same subobject [...]
> "
>
> I am wondering why gcc doesn't (can't?) complain about this?

Does -Woverride-init (included in -Wextra / -W) not work?  If so, please
file a bug report.

Thanks,


Segher

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/