[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DDE95BDD51FB774B804A9C029E735EE10379BEDA33@sausexmbp02.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:44:59 -0500
From: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>
To: "'Rusty Russell'" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/6] x86/cpufreq: use cpumask_copy instead of =
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:12:16 am Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
> > > powernow_k8_target is problematic: it grabs a mutex. cpufreq
> > > people, is this called often?
> >
> > Yes. It's the function that makes a frequency change
> > happen, so 5+ times per second per core isn't
> > unreasonable.
>
> Right, so we need to revisit this. I'll leave it for the
> moment and put it on my TODO list.
Rusty -
Did you ever get any ideas on a solution to this? I'm
getting reports that the set_cpus_allowed_ptr() in
powernow_k8_target() is breaking with changeset
ebc79c4f8da0f92efa968e0328f32334a2ce80cf . I haven't
changed the powernow_k8 code, so I suspect something
happened to set_cpus_allowed_ptr().
-Mark Langsdorf
Operating System Research Center
AMD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists