[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253553472.9654.236.camel@desktop>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:17:52 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, sachinp@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs for
SLQB to use as per-node areas
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 17:10 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> SLQB uses DEFINE_PER_CPU to define per-node areas. An implicit
> assumption is made that all valid node IDs will have matching valid CPU
> ids. In memoryless configurations, it is possible to have a node ID with
> no CPU having the same ID. When this happens, a per-cpu are is not
> created and the value of paca[cpu].data_offset is some random value.
> This is later deferenced and the system crashes after accessing some
> invalid address.
>
> This patch hacks powerpc to allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs that
> have no corresponding CPU id. This gets around the immediate problem but
> it should be discussed if there is a requirement for a DEFINE_PER_NODE
> and how it should be implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> index 1f68160..a5f52d4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> @@ -588,6 +588,26 @@ void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> paca[i].data_offset = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
> memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_start, __per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start);
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLQB
> + /*
> + * SLQB abuses DEFINE_PER_CPU to setup a per-node area. This trick
> + * assumes that ever node ID will have a CPU of that ID to match.
> + * On systems with memoryless nodes, this may not hold true. Hence,
> + * we take a second pass initialising a "per-cpu" area for node-ids
> + * that SLQB can use
> + */
Very trivial, but there's a little trailing whitespace in the first line
of the comment (checkpatch warns on it.) You also spelled initializing
wrong.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists