linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs for SLQB to use as per-node areas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1253554181.9654.238.camel@desktop>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:29:41 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, sachinp@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs for
 SLQB to use as per-node areas

On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 10:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:17:52 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 17:10 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > SLQB uses DEFINE_PER_CPU to define per-node areas. An implicit
> > > assumption is made that all valid node IDs will have matching valid CPU
> > > ids. In memoryless configurations, it is possible to have a node ID with
> > > no CPU having the same ID. When this happens, a per-cpu are is not
> > > created and the value of paca[cpu].data_offset is some random value.
> > > This is later deferenced and the system crashes after accessing some
> > > invalid address.
> > > 
> > > This patch hacks powerpc to allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs that
> > > have no corresponding CPU id. This gets around the immediate problem but
> > > it should be discussed if there is a requirement for a DEFINE_PER_NODE
> > > and how it should be implemented.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> > > index 1f68160..a5f52d4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> > > @@ -588,6 +588,26 @@ void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> > >  		paca[i].data_offset = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
> > >  		memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_start, __per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start);
> > >  	}
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SLQB
> > > +	/* 
> > > +	 * SLQB abuses DEFINE_PER_CPU to setup a per-node area. This trick
> > > +	 * assumes that ever node ID will have a CPU of that ID to match.
> > > +	 * On systems with memoryless nodes, this may not hold true. Hence,
> > > +	 * we take a second pass initialising a "per-cpu" area for node-ids
> > > +	 * that SLQB can use
> > > +	 */
> > 
> > Very trivial, but there's a little trailing whitespace in the first line
> > of the comment (checkpatch warns on it.) You also spelled initializing
> > wrong.
> 
> re: spelling.  Not really.  Think internationally.

Yeah, I realized that after I sent it .. So misspelled in the American
sense I guess.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/