[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253567539.17725.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:12:19 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] oom: dump stack and VM state when oom killer panics
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 13:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> The code shouldn't be using printk_ratelimit() - in fact nothing should
> be using it and we should remove printk_ratelimit() from the kernel, I
> suspect.
Perhaps a per instance use instead. Something like:
#define printk_ratelimited(fmt, arg...) \
({ static struct ratelimit_state _rs = { \
.interval = DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, \
.burst = DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST, \
}; \
int rtn; \
\
if (!__ratelimit(&_rs)) \
rtn = printk(fmt, ##arg); \
else \
rtn = 0; \
rtn; \
})
#define pr_info_rl(fmt, arg) \
printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##arg)
etc...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists