[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253507034.23414.90.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:23:54 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
Cc: Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr.13a@...enparkplatz.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor desktop responsiveness with background I/O-operations
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 17:22 -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> Wow, at first I did not notice anything
> from your *.sh script, but then a few moments
> later, the system became vary sluggish. firefox
> takes about 15 seconds to load. OS is mint linux
> with the latest HEAD on an imac9,1.
CFQ inherits IO priority from the parent on fork(), so nicing a shell or
the dd should (and does) help a LOT. It also inherits the CPU scheduler
class. I just checked, and IO does indeed inherit SCHED_IDLE as well as
the RT classes (SCHED_BATCH does nothing). Setting the dd to SCHED_IDLE
makes a big difference, as it should, so there's a bigger hammer than
nice + ionice. SCHED_IDLE is CPU_adorable + IO_nicest.
Anyway, the problem seems to have to have at least two facets:
1. streaming IO causing pagecache reclaim. That problem doesn't seem
to want to go away. Fixing that won't help 2 one bit though.
2. reads are sync, more heavily affected by seek latency than writes.
If the disk your binaries live on is seeking a lot, you pay a LOT.
Hohum, IO + VM = haaaaard ;-)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists