lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <928CFBE8E7CB0040959E56B4EA41A77EC69BA5E0@irsmsx504.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:12:12 +0100
From:	"Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>,
	"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...abs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] perf_counter/powerpc: Fix compilation after
   perf_counter_overflow change

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:paulus@...ba.org]
>Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:45 AM


>Markus, please take care in future to mention it in the changelog if
>your patches touch definitions used by other architectures.  If you
>could go so far as to use grep a bit more and fix up other
>architectures' callsites for the things you're changing, that would be
>very much appreciated.  Thanks.

I'm sorry I missed that.

There's one more place in arch/sparc/.
The below patch should fix it, but I have no means to test it.

Index: b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_ha
 
 	regs = args->regs;
 
-	data.regs = regs;
 	data.addr = 0;
 
 	cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters);
@@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_ha
 		if (!sparc_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx))
 			continue;
 
-		if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data))
+		if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data, regs))
 			sparc_pmu_disable_counter(hwc, idx);
 	}


thanks and regards,
markus.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr.
VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ