[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909211031.25369.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:31:25 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ebmunson@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove duplicate asm/mman.h files
On Friday 18 September 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > -#define MCL_CURRENT 1 /* lock all current mappings */
> > -#define MCL_FUTURE 2 /* lock all future mappings */
> > +#define MAP_GROWSUP 0x0200 /* register stack-like segment */
> >
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> ia64 doesn't use MAP_GROWSUP, so it's probably not necessary to carry it
> along with your cleanup.
ia64 is the only architecture defining it, nobody uses it in the kernel.
If the ia64 maintainers want to remove it in a separate patch, that
would probably be a good idea.
I tried not to change the ABI in any way in my patch, and there is
a theoretical possibility that some user space program on ia64 currently
depends on that definition.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists