| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090921085843.GF12726@csn.ul.ie> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:58:44 +0100 From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>, Tso Ted <tytso@....edu>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, James Ketrenos <jketreno@...ux.intel.com>, "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: ipw2200: firmware DMA loading rework On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 03:25:32PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Wednesday 02 September 2009 20:26:17 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 September 2009 20:02:14 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Bartlomiej > > > Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@...il.com> wrote: > > > > On Sunday 30 August 2009 14:37:42 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > >> On Friday 28 August 2009 05:42:31 Zhu Yi wrote: > > > >> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz reported an atomic order-6 allocation failure > > > >> > for ipw2200 firmware loading in kernel 2.6.30. High order allocation is > > > >> > > > >> s/2.6.30/2.6.31-rc6/ > > > >> > > > >> The issue has always been there but it was some recent change that > > > >> explicitly triggered the allocation failures (after 2.6.31-rc1). > > > > > > > > ipw2200 fix works fine but yesterday I got the following error while mounting > > > > ext4 filesystem (mb_history is optional so the mount succeeded): > > > > > > OK so the mount succeeded. > > > > > > > EXT4-fs (dm-2): barriers enabled > > > > kjournald2 starting: pid 3137, dev dm-2:8, commit interval 5 seconds > > > > EXT4-fs (dm-2): internal journal on dm-2:8 > > > > EXT4-fs (dm-2): delayed allocation enabled > > > > EXT4-fs: file extents enabled > > > > mount: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0xc0d0 > > > > Pid: 3136, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.31-rc8-00015-gadda766-dirty #78 > > > > Call Trace: > > > > [<c0394de3>] ? printk+0xf/0x14 > > > > [<c016a693>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x400/0x442 > > > > [<c016a71b>] __get_free_pages+0xf/0x32 > > > > [<c01865cf>] __kmalloc+0x28/0xfa > > > > [<c023d96f>] ? __spin_lock_init+0x28/0x4d > > > > [<c01f529d>] ext4_mb_init+0x392/0x460 > > > > [<c01e99d2>] ext4_fill_super+0x1b96/0x2012 > > > > [<c0239bc8>] ? snprintf+0x15/0x17 > > > > [<c01c0b26>] ? disk_name+0x24/0x69 > > > > [<c018ba63>] get_sb_bdev+0xda/0x117 > > > > [<c01e6711>] ext4_get_sb+0x13/0x15 > > > > [<c01e7e3c>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2012 > > > > [<c018ad2d>] vfs_kern_mount+0x3b/0x76 > > > > [<c018adad>] do_kern_mount+0x33/0xbd > > > > [<c019d0af>] do_mount+0x660/0x6b8 > > > > [<c016a71b>] ? __get_free_pages+0xf/0x32 > > > > [<c019d168>] sys_mount+0x61/0x99 > > > > [<c0102908>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36 > > > > Mem-Info: > > > > DMA per-cpu: > > > > CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > > > > Normal per-cpu: > > > > CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 0 > > > > Active_anon:25471 active_file:22802 inactive_anon:25812 > > > > inactive_file:33619 unevictable:2 dirty:2452 writeback:135 unstable:0 > > > > free:4346 slab:4308 mapped:26038 pagetables:912 bounce:0 > > > > DMA free:2060kB min:84kB low:104kB high:124kB active_anon:1660kB inactive_anon:1848kB active_file:144kB inactive_file:868kB unevictable:0kB present:15788kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > > > > lowmem_reserve[]: 0 489 489 > > > > Normal free:15324kB min:2788kB low:3484kB high:4180kB active_anon:100224kB inactive_anon:101400kB active_file:91064kB inactive_file:133608kB unevictable:8kB present:501392kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > > > > lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 > > > > DMA: 1*4kB 1*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2060kB > > > > Normal: 1283*4kB 648*8kB 159*16kB 53*32kB 10*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 15324kB > > > > 57947 total pagecache pages > > > > 878 pages in swap cache > > > > Swap cache stats: add 920, delete 42, find 11/11 > > > > Free swap = 1016436kB > > > > Total swap = 1020116kB > > > > 131056 pages RAM > > > > 4233 pages reserved > > > > 90573 pages shared > > > > 77286 pages non-shared > > > > EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled > > > > EXT4-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode > > > > > > > > Thus it seems like the original bug is still there and any ideas how to > > > > debug the problem further are appreciated.. > > > > > > > > The complete dmesg and kernel config are here: > > > > > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bart/ext4-paf.dmesg > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bart/ext4-paf.config > > > > > > This looks very similar to the kmemleak ext4 reports upon a mount. If > > > it is the same issue, which from the trace it seems it is, then this > > > is due to an extra kmalloc() allocation and this apparently will not > > > get fixed on 2.6.31 due to the closeness of the merge window and the > > > non-criticalness this issue has been deemed. > > > > > > A patch fix is part of the ext4-patchqueue > > > http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git > > > > Thanks for the pointer but the page allocation failures that I hit seem > > to be caused by the memory management itself and the ext4 issue fixed by: > > > > http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git?a=blob;f=memory-leak-fix-ext4_group_info-allocation;h=c919fff34e70ec85f96d1833f9ce460c451000de;hb=HEAD > > > > is a different problem (unrelated to this one). > > Here is another data point. > > This time it is an order-6 page allocation failure for rt2870sta > (w/ upcoming driver changes) and Linus' tree from few days ago.. > It's another high-order atomic allocation which is difficult to grant. I didn't look closely, but is this the same type of thing - large allocation failure during firmware loading? If so, is this during resume or is the device being reloaded for some other reason? I suspect that there are going to be a few of these bugs cropping up every so often where network devices are assuming large atomic allocations will succeed because the "only time they happen" is during boot but these days are happening at runtime for other reasons. > ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:6, mode:0x8020 > Pid: 4752, comm: ifconfig Tainted: G WC 2.6.31-04082-g1824090-dirty #80 > Call Trace: > [<c03996f2>] ? printk+0xf/0x15 > [<c016b841>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x41d/0x462 > [<c010681e>] dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x53/0xbd > [<c02f83aa>] hcd_buffer_alloc+0xdb/0xe8 > [<c01067cb>] ? dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x0/0xbd > [<c02ee2d6>] usb_buffer_alloc+0x16/0x1d > [<e121b627>] NICInitTransmit+0xe2/0x7e4 [rt2870sta] > [<e121bfb1>] RTMPAllocTxRxRingMemory+0x11c/0x17b [rt2870sta] > [<e11f0960>] rt28xx_init+0xa5/0x3f8 [rt2870sta] > [<e121194a>] rt28xx_open+0x53/0xa2 [rt2870sta] > [<e1211b77>] MainVirtualIF_open+0x23/0xf6 [rt2870sta] > [<c03383a4>] dev_open+0x86/0xbb > [<c0337b1a>] dev_change_flags+0x96/0x147 > [<c036e9cb>] devinet_ioctl+0x20f/0x4f8 > [<c036fc8f>] inet_ioctl+0x8e/0xa7 > [<c032ab50>] sock_ioctl+0x1c9/0x1ed > [<c032a987>] ? sock_ioctl+0x0/0x1ed > [<c0195732>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x71 > [<c0195cbb>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x491/0x4cf > [<c01779d6>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x242/0x4ff > [<c0119609>] ? do_page_fault+0x102/0x292 > [<c0140721>] ? up_read+0x16/0x29 > [<c0195d27>] sys_ioctl+0x2e/0x48 > [<c0102908>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36 > Mem-Info: > DMA per-cpu: > CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > Normal per-cpu: > CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 84 > Active_anon:14664 active_file:30057 inactive_anon:31744 > inactive_file:29940 unevictable:2 dirty:11 writeback:0 unstable:0 > free:5421 slab:4037 mapped:7781 pagetables:963 bounce:0 > DMA free:2060kB min:84kB low:104kB high:124kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:124kB active_file:3284kB inactive_file:972kB unevictable:0kB present:15788kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > lowmem_reserve[]: 0 489 489 > Normal free:19624kB min:2788kB low:3484kB high:4180kB active_anon:58656kB inactive_anon:126852kB active_file:116944kB inactive_file:118788kB unevictable:8kB present:501392kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 > DMA: 3*4kB 0*8kB 2*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2060kB > Normal: 2180*4kB 625*8kB 303*16kB 33*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 19624kB > 64568 total pagecache pages > 3652 pages in swap cache > Swap cache stats: add 21642, delete 17990, find 4906/6079 > Free swap = 981700kB > Total swap = 1020116kB > 131056 pages RAM > 4262 pages reserved > 91941 pages shared > 60834 pages non-shared > <-- ERROR in Alloc TX TxContext[0] HTTX_BUFFER !! > <-- RTMPAllocTxRxRingMemory, Status=3 > ERROR!!! RTMPAllocDMAMemory failed, Status[=0x00000003] > !!! rt28xx Initialized fail !!! > -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists