[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0909220933090.27145@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:33:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input/keyboard: new driver for ADP5520 MFD PMICs
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > + if (event & KP_INT) {
> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_1, ®_val_low);
> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_2, ®_val_high);
> > +
> > + keymask = (reg_val_high << 8) | reg_val_low;
> > + /* Read twice to clear */
> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_1, ®_val_low);
> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_2, ®_val_high);
> > + keymask |= (reg_val_high << 8) | reg_val_low;
> > + adp5520_keys_report_event(dev, keymask, 1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (event & KR_INT) {
>
> Why do you check the same condition twice?
It actually doesn't seem to be the same condition (KP_INT vs. KR_INT), but
it's difficult to say, as these constants are apparently added in some
other patch I have no idea about.
And the same for other constants used in the code ... the patch seems to
be quite incomplete.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists