| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1253584591.7103.197.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:56:31 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event, powerpc: Fix compilation after big
perf_counter rename
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 09:48 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> This fixes two places in the powerpc perf_event (perf_counter) code
> where 'list_entry' needs to be changed to 'group_entry', but were
> missed in commit 65abc865 ("perf_counter: Rename list_entry ->
> group_entry, counter_list -> group_list").
Ingo: This is becoming a recurring one now... powerpc build upstream is
broken approx everyday by some new perfctr build breakage.
You really aren't build testing other architectures than x86 right ?
Ben.
> This also changes 'event' back to 'counter' in a couple of contexts:
>
> * Field and function names that deal with the limited-function
> counters: it's really the hardware counters whose function is
> limited, not the events that they count. Hence:
>
> MAX_LIMITED_HWEVENTS -> MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS
> limited_event -> limited_counter
> freeze/thaw_limited_events -> freeze/thaw_limited_counters
>
> * The machine-specific PMU description struct (struct power_pmu): this
> renames 'n_event' back to 'n_counter' since it really describes how
> many hardware counters the machine has. (Renaming this back avoids
> a compile error in each of the machine-specific PMU back-ends where
> they initialize their power_pmu struct.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 +--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index 2499aaa..3288ce3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>
> #define MAX_HWEVENTS 8
> #define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
> -#define MAX_LIMITED_HWEVENTS 2
> +#define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
>
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> */
> struct power_pmu {
> const char *name;
> - int n_event;
> + int n_counter;
> int max_alternatives;
> unsigned long add_fields;
> unsigned long test_adder;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 197b7d9..bbcbae1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> unsigned long mmcr[3];
> - struct perf_event *limited_event[MAX_LIMITED_HWEVENTS];
> - u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWEVENTS];
> + struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> + u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
> unsigned long amasks[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
> unsigned long avalues[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int power_check_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> unsigned long addf = ppmu->add_fields;
> unsigned long tadd = ppmu->test_adder;
>
> - if (n_ev > ppmu->n_event)
> + if (n_ev > ppmu->n_counter)
> return -1;
>
> /* First see if the events will go on as-is */
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static int is_limited_pmc(int pmcnum)
> && (pmcnum == 5 || pmcnum == 6);
> }
>
> -static void freeze_limited_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> +static void freeze_limited_counters(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> unsigned long pmc5, unsigned long pmc6)
> {
> struct perf_event *event;
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static void freeze_limited_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < cpuhw->n_limited; ++i) {
> - event = cpuhw->limited_event[i];
> + event = cpuhw->limited_counter[i];
> if (!event->hw.idx)
> continue;
> val = (event->hw.idx == 5) ? pmc5 : pmc6;
> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static void freeze_limited_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> }
> }
>
> -static void thaw_limited_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> +static void thaw_limited_counters(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> unsigned long pmc5, unsigned long pmc6)
> {
> struct perf_event *event;
> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static void thaw_limited_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw,
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < cpuhw->n_limited; ++i) {
> - event = cpuhw->limited_event[i];
> + event = cpuhw->limited_counter[i];
> event->hw.idx = cpuhw->limited_hwidx[i];
> val = (event->hw.idx == 5) ? pmc5 : pmc6;
> atomic64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
> @@ -495,9 +495,9 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
> "i" (SPRN_PMC5), "i" (SPRN_PMC6));
>
> if (mmcr0 & MMCR0_FC)
> - freeze_limited_events(cpuhw, pmc5, pmc6);
> + freeze_limited_counters(cpuhw, pmc5, pmc6);
> else
> - thaw_limited_events(cpuhw, pmc5, pmc6);
> + thaw_limited_counters(cpuhw, pmc5, pmc6);
>
> /*
> * Write the full MMCR0 including the event overflow interrupt
> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
> continue;
> idx = hwc_index[i] + 1;
> if (is_limited_pmc(idx)) {
> - cpuhw->limited_event[n_lim] = event;
> + cpuhw->limited_counter[n_lim] = event;
> cpuhw->limited_hwidx[n_lim] = idx;
> ++n_lim;
> continue;
> @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static int collect_events(struct perf_event *group, int max_count,
> flags[n] = group->hw.event_base;
> events[n++] = group->hw.config;
> }
> - list_for_each_entry(event, &group->sibling_list, list_entry) {
> + list_for_each_entry(event, &group->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> if (!is_software_event(event) &&
> event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
> if (n >= max_count)
> @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
> return 0;
> cpuhw = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
> n0 = cpuhw->n_events;
> - n = collect_events(group_leader, ppmu->n_event - n0,
> + n = collect_events(group_leader, ppmu->n_counter - n0,
> &cpuhw->event[n0], &cpuhw->events[n0],
> &cpuhw->flags[n0]);
> if (n < 0)
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
> cpuctx->active_oncpu += n;
> n = 1;
> event_sched_in(group_leader, cpu);
> - list_for_each_entry(sub, &group_leader->sibling_list, list_entry) {
> + list_for_each_entry(sub, &group_leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> if (sub->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
> event_sched_in(sub, cpu);
> ++n;
> @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static int power_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> */
> cpuhw = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
> n0 = cpuhw->n_events;
> - if (n0 >= ppmu->n_event)
> + if (n0 >= ppmu->n_counter)
> goto out;
> cpuhw->event[n0] = event;
> cpuhw->events[n0] = event->hw.config;
> @@ -848,11 +848,11 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct perf_event *event)
> }
> }
> for (i = 0; i < cpuhw->n_limited; ++i)
> - if (event == cpuhw->limited_event[i])
> + if (event == cpuhw->limited_counter[i])
> break;
> if (i < cpuhw->n_limited) {
> while (++i < cpuhw->n_limited) {
> - cpuhw->limited_event[i-1] = cpuhw->limited_event[i];
> + cpuhw->limited_counter[i-1] = cpuhw->limited_counter[i];
> cpuhw->limited_hwidx[i-1] = cpuhw->limited_hwidx[i];
> }
> --cpuhw->n_limited;
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> */
> n = 0;
> if (event->group_leader != event) {
> - n = collect_events(event->group_leader, ppmu->n_event - 1,
> + n = collect_events(event->group_leader, ppmu->n_counter - 1,
> ctrs, events, cflags);
> if (n < 0)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static void perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> int nmi;
>
> if (cpuhw->n_limited)
> - freeze_limited_events(cpuhw, mfspr(SPRN_PMC5),
> + freeze_limited_counters(cpuhw, mfspr(SPRN_PMC5),
> mfspr(SPRN_PMC6));
>
> perf_read_regs(regs);
> @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ static void perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * Any that we processed in the previous loop will not be negative.
> */
> if (!found) {
> - for (i = 0; i < ppmu->n_event; ++i) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ppmu->n_counter; ++i) {
> if (is_limited_pmc(i + 1))
> continue;
> val = read_pmc(i + 1);
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists