[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090922102415.GF12254@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:24:16 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
sachinp@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:21:15PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 11:05 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > I'm going to punt the decision on this one to Pekka or Nick. My feeling
> > is leave it enabled for NUMA so it can be identified if it gets fixed
> > for some other reason - e.g. the stalls are due to a per-cpu problem as
> > stated by Sachin and SLQB happens to exasperate the problem.
>
> Can I have a tested patch that uses MAX_NUMNODES to allocate the
> structs, please? We can convert SLQB over to per-cpu allocator if the
> memoryless node issue is resolved.
>
Patch set in the process of testing. Should have something in a few
hours.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists