[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0909220835340.31679@localhost>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:37:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: best practices: which "uaccess.h" should one include?
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 September 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > philosophically, which is the "correct" uaccess.h header file to
> > include in kernel code -- <linux/uaccess.h> or <asm/uaccess.h>?
> > the first explicitly includes the second so that's a safe choice
> > but, generally, there's been a tendency to shift toward including
> > the "linux" header files. opinion? there's quite a mixture under
> > the drivers/ directory.
>
> The preferred one is linux/uaccess.h, the same is true for many
> headers that traditionally only existed in asm/.
i know -- i've sent in a few patches of my own to make some of those
changes. i just wanted to be clear since i'm writing a short tutorial
on kernel/user space copying and wanted to make the correct
recommendation for the header file to include.
> There are some headers with explicit #warning or #error messages
> when they are not included from linux/foo.h, e.g. spinlock_types.h,
> bitops.h or rwsem.h.
yup, i've seen those, too. thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists