[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090922044310.GA29208@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:43:10 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Caveh Jalali <ecaveh@...il.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] warn about use of uninstalled kernel headers
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:37:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> User applications frequently hit problems when they try to use
> the kernel headers directly, rather than the exported headers.
>
> This adds an explicit warning for this case, and points to
> a URL holding an explanation of why this is wrong and what
> to do about it.
Like the idea.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 6 ++++++
> scripts/headers_install.pl | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index d6320a3..f392d72 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -656,6 +656,12 @@ extern int do_sysinfo(struct sysinfo *info);
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> +#ifndef __EXPORTED_HEADERS__
But why do we need this "__EXPORTED_HEADERS__" thing?
?
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists