lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253634632-8398-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:50:32 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Add some brief design documentation

Provide some brief documentation of some of the design decisions that
are made by the regulator API.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 Documentation/power/regulator/design.txt |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/power/regulator/design.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/power/regulator/design.txt b/Documentation/power/regulator/design.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f9b56b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/power/regulator/design.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+Regulator API design notes
+==========================
+
+This document provides a brief, partially structured, overview of some
+of the design considerations which impact the regulator API design.
+
+Safety
+------
+
+ - Errors in regulator configuration can have very serious consequences
+   for the system, potentially including lasting hardware damage.
+ - It is not possible to automatically determine the power confugration
+   of the system - software-equivalent variants of the same chip may
+   have different power requirments, and not all components with power
+   requirements are visible to software.
+
+  => The API should make no changes to the hardware state unless it has
+     specific knowledge that these changes are safe to do perform on
+     this particular system.
+
+Consumer use cases
+------------------
+
+ - The overwhelming majority of devices in a system will have no
+   requirement to do any runtime configuration of their power beyond
+   being able to turn it on or off.
+
+ - Many of the power supplies in the system will be shared between many
+   different consumers.
+
+  => The consumer API should be structured so that these use cases are
+     very easy to handle and so that consumers will work with shared
+     supplies without any additional effort.
-- 
1.6.3.3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ