[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090922172347.GG14381@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:23:47 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, npiggin@...e.de,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ext4: Convert filesystem to the new truncate
calling convention
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:16:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > No. We already have one half-finished series here; mixing it with another
> > one is not going to happen. Such flags are tolerable only as bisectability
> > helpers. They *must* disappear by the end of series. Before it can be
> > submitted for merge.
> >
> > In effect, you are mixing truncate switchover with your writepage one.
> > Please, split and reorder.
> Well, this wasn't meant as a final version of those patches. It was
> meant as a request for comment whether it makes sence to fix the problem
> how I propose to fix it. If we agree on that, I'll go and convert the rest
> of filesystems so that we can remove .new_writepage hack. By that time I
> hope that new truncate sequence patches will be merged so that dependency
> should go away as well...
Could you carve just the ext4 part of truncate series out of that and
post it separately?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists