[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090922190419.GA24542@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:04:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI].
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> On 09/22/09 11:02, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > obviously they are workload dependent - that's why numbers were
> > posted in this thread with various workloads. Do you concur with
> > those conclusions that they are generally a speedup over paravirt?
> > If not, which are the workloads where paravirt offers significant
> > speedup over hardware acceleration?
>
> We're not in a position to do any useful measurements yet.
Sorry for being dense, but what does that mean precisely? No available
hardware? Xen doesnt run?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists