[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909222338.32646.agruen@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:38:32 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
alan@...ux.intel.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: fanotify as syscalls
On Tuesday, 22 September 2009 23:06:16 Eric Paris wrote:
> this is true, if there is only one namespace subtree notification works
> the same as global notification.
>
> [...]
>
> I don't see how subtree notification can possibly solve the global
> notification problem.
I'm thinking of is something like this: A listener registers interest in "/",
recursively. The kernel sets a FSNOTIFY_WATCH_RECURSIVE flag on "/" and each
mount point below. Afterwards when something is mounted anywhere, same
namespace or not, the kernel sets the new mount's FSNOTIFY_WATCH_RECURSIVE
flag if the parent mount has this flag set.
(Of course we need per fsnotify_group flags and not global ones, but this
doesn't change the principle.)
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists