[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20090922075153.00be9690@pop3.arnes.si>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:59:14 +0200
From: Tomaz Mertelj <tomaz.mertelj@...st.arnes.si>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Driver for Texas Instruments
amc6821 chip
At 14:44 21. 9. 2009 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 09:34:35 +0200
>Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
>
> > > #define set_temp_para(name, reg)\
> > > static ssize_t set_##name(\
> > > struct device *dev,\
> > > struct device_attribute *attr,\
> > > const char *buf,\
> > > size_t count)\
> > > {\
> > > return set_helper(dev, attr, buf, count, &dev->name);\
> > > }
> > >
> > > And then do all the real work in a common function? Rather than
> > > expanding tens of copies of the same thing?
> >
> > Yes please. We got rid of macro-generated callbacks in most hwmon
> > drivers a couple years ago already.
>
>I never received an update to this patch so I'm retaining it in my tree
>for now.
OK. I have an update almost ready. I only need some time to test it.
Should I post a patch on top of the original patch or a full patch to the
latest kernel tree?
Tomaz Mertelj
***********************************************************************************
Tomaz Mertelj
E-mail: tomaz.mertelj@...st.arnes.si Home page:
http://optlab.ijs.si/tmertelj
Staniceva 14
1000 Ljubljana
Slovenia
***********************************************************************************
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists