[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB86ED1.1040200@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:29:37 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] checkpatch: add a blacklist
Daniel Walker wrote:
> There are times when maintainers intentially don't follow the coding
> style. When that happens it means some errors need to be ignored, so
> that other errors can be focused on.
>
> To handle that I added a blacklist to checkpatch. The blacklist holds the
> file names and errors which are ignored. The output is modified to
> remove the errors from the list and not to count them.
>
> When the blacklist kicks in there is a note that does list how many
> errors got removed and that it was due to a blacklist entry. There is
> also a new option "--noblacklist" that allows the errors to be added
> back as it was without the blacklist.
>
So, for this piece of code:
TRACE_EVENT(...
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->foo = bar( xxx );
),
)
checkpatch won't report the spaces inside bar()?
If so, I don't like this patch.
Could you just teach checkpatch to recognize those macros used
in TRACE_EVENT(), if those coding-style "errors" bother you
so much that you can't put up with them?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists