[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020909230020m3a562220x8eda4f102e452c48@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:20:46 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Eric B Munson <ebmunson@...ibm.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: v2.6.31-7381-g7fa0772: new build warnings: kmemcheck,
__deprecated, hugetlb, radeon
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Stefan Richter
<stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> Latest git compiles with extreme noise:
>
> In file included from include/net/inet_connection_sock.h:23,
> from include/linux/tcp.h:178,
> from include/linux/ipv6.h:215,
> from include/net/ipv6.h:16,
> from include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h:25,
> from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:52,
> from kernel/sysctl.c:48:
> include/net/inet_sock.h: In function 'inet_reqsk_alloc':
> include/net/inet_sock.h:208: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and
> code
>
> Vegard, this is obviously caused by commit
> 45e3ff82708c65c895d5c5882aff17ecf62a80b5.
>
> $ grep KMEMCH .config
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK=y
>
> (I.e. CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is off.)
Curious, I haven't seen this before. Is it coming from the
BUILD_BUG_ON() in kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield()? I can't seem to spot
the error.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists