[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB9CF44.1030301@ge.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:33:24 +0200
From: Enrik Berkhan <Enrik.Berkhan@...com>
To: Марк Коренберг
<socketpair@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: splice between non-pipe (tcp socket) fds
Марк Коренберг wrote:
> I want splice() to work with two tcp sockets().I think to implement
> this. Two questions:
This works already by introducing a pipe between the two:
while (0 < (len = splice(sock1, 0, pipe, 0, max_len, some_flags)))
splice(pipe, 0, sock2, 0, len, some_flags);
Just like with read(2) and write(2), but without copy to/from userspace.
> 1. Is any work in this direction?
> 2. Why this functionality does not implemented now? any difficulties?
>
> I think API should consist of 2 main functions:
> 1. detach available buffers from fd1 (and save info in some struct)
> 2. attach buffers to fd2 (from this struct)
> this functions should be called under some lock to guarantee
> atomicity. if something happen, return buffers back to original file.
What about full duplex?
> At now, I think that the most quick way to acheive my results, is to
> create intermediate temporary pipe inside kernel and splice from
> non-pipe fd to pipe, and than from pipe to second non-pipe fd.
Have a look at the "sendfile emulation" in fs/splice.c. Maybe you can
generalize that in some way or the other.
Enrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists