linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090923122530.GB6390@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:25:30 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
	michael@...dence.eu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
	Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class


* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:

>> discouraging contributions is more something that happens when you 
>> get the responses I got earlier in this thread..
>
> That's probably intentional.  Whitespace fixes have their place but 
> not at this stage in a patch's lifecycle.

Exactly. What might make sense is to scan linux-next for new commits 
that show serious cleanliness trouble - and send fix patches to the 
parties involved. That's a real effort and brings the code forward.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/