[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090923135600.GA11463@localhost>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:56:00 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6 -v2] writeback: balance_dirty_pages() shall write more
than dirtied pages
Some filesystem may choose to write much more than ratelimit_pages
before calling balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(). So it is safer to
determine number to write based on real number of dirtied pages.
Otherwise it is possible that
loop {
btrfs_file_write(): dirty 1024 pages
balance_dirty_pages(): write up to 48 pages (= ratelimit_pages * 1.5)
}
in which the writeback rate cannot keep up with dirty rate, and the
dirty pages go all the way beyond dirty_thresh.
The increased write_chunk may make the dirtier more bumpy.
So filesystems shall be take care not to dirty too much at
a time (eg. > 4MB) without checking the ratelimit.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- linux.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2009-09-23 21:41:21.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/page-writeback.c 2009-09-23 21:42:17.000000000 +0800
@@ -44,12 +44,15 @@ static long ratelimit_pages = 32;
/*
* When balance_dirty_pages decides that the caller needs to perform some
* non-background writeback, this is how many pages it will attempt to write.
- * It should be somewhat larger than RATELIMIT_PAGES to ensure that reasonably
+ * It should be somewhat larger than dirtied pages to ensure that reasonably
* large amounts of I/O are submitted.
*/
-static inline long sync_writeback_pages(void)
+static inline long sync_writeback_pages(unsigned long dirtied)
{
- return ratelimit_pages + ratelimit_pages / 2;
+ if (dirtied < ratelimit_pages)
+ dirtied = ratelimit_pages;
+
+ return dirtied + dirtied / 2;
}
/* The following parameters are exported via /proc/sys/vm */
@@ -476,7 +479,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackgro
* If we're over `background_thresh' then pdflush is woken to perform some
* writeout.
*/
-static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
+static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
+ unsigned long write_chunk)
{
long nr_reclaimable, bdi_nr_reclaimable;
long nr_writeback, bdi_nr_writeback;
@@ -484,7 +488,6 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
unsigned long dirty_thresh;
unsigned long bdi_thresh;
unsigned long pages_written = 0;
- unsigned long write_chunk = sync_writeback_pages();
unsigned long pause = 1;
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
@@ -639,9 +642,10 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
p = &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);
*p += nr_pages_dirtied;
if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit)) {
+ ratelimit = sync_writeback_pages(*p);
*p = 0;
preempt_enable();
- balance_dirty_pages(mapping);
+ balance_dirty_pages(mapping, ratelimit);
return;
}
preempt_enable();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists