lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ABA6400.8060901@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:08:00 +0100
From:	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
To:	Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Use generic binary search function

Tim Abbott wrote:
>> The builtin symbol tables are now sorted, so we can use a binary
>> search.
>>     
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> There a large number hand-coded binary searches in the kernel (run
> "git grep search | grep binary" to find many of them).  Since getting
> binary searches right is difficult, I've been meaning to submit a
> patch adding a lib/bsearch.c for some time now, so that we only have
> to get binary search right in one place.
>
> This patch series contains a generic binary search implementation as
> well as something converting your module.c patch to use it.  I haven't
> had a chance to boot-test yet,

You might want to wait.  I found some weirdness in my patches - as if my 
bsearch is backwards but the tables are also being reversed.

Whatever the problem, it endorses the idea of having one known good 
bsearch function :-).

>  but this should give you a sense of
> what this is going to look like.  To me, you take some somewhat
> complex code and replace it with some very straightforward code.
>
> This generic binary search implementation comes from Ksplice.  It has
> the same basic API as the C library bsearch() function.  Ksplice uses
> it in half a dozen places with 4 different comparison functions, and I
> think our code is substantially cleaner because of this.
>
> I don't claim that this is a perfect implementation of binary search,
> though it is reasonably well tested.  My theory is that it is about as
> good as all the hand-coded copies all over the kernel, and we can
> optimize it to perfection later.
>
> Tim Abbott (2):
>   lib: Add generic binary search function to the kernel.
>   module: use bsearch in find_symbol_in_kernel_section.
>
>  include/linux/bsearch.h |    9 ++++++++
>  kernel/module.c         |   34 +++++++++++++----------------
>  lib/Makefile            |    2 +-
>  lib/bsearch.c           |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/bsearch.h
>  create mode 100644 lib/bsearch.c
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ