linux-kernel - Re: mailing list for trace users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <520f0cf10909231242r598b0bebtf99c8bea9690d11f@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:42:21 +0200
From:	John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, fweisbec@...il.com, acme@...hat.com,
	mhiramat@...hat.com, postmaster@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mailing list for trace users

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:40 PM, John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>>
>> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:47:25 +0200
>>>
>>> > Could you please also create the linux-perf-users list, for perf
>>> > events and the perf tool related user questions? (We have asked for
>>> > this before but must have gotten lost somewhere)
>>>
>>> I think your communities are similar enough and small enough that you
>>> could share this list.
>>
>> It's two separate subsystems. There's a lot of non-tracing aspects of
>> performance events: it does profiling, counting, latency analysis, etc.
>> The tool is named 'perf', the subsystem is named 'performance events',
>> and the most typical workflows dont do any tracing.
>>
>> And i beg to differ about the size of the communities. It's just been
>> added upstream...
>>
>> Also, what is the policy for adding new lists to vger.kernel.org? If a
>> subsystem maintainer asks for a list named after a core kernel
>> subsystem, how frequently is it rejected, and on what basis?
>>
>> I find it sad that such an arbitrary looking negative decision from you
>> forces a user list away from vger. I wouldnt mind it to be closed if it
>> has no significant traffic after a year or lifetime or so - many vger
>> lists have almost no traffic to begin with.
>>
>> Also, i cannot help but to observe the fact that you've fought the
>> original perfcounters project in a very ugly and public way less than a
>> year ago. Dont you think that you 'deciding' this matter in such a
>> negative fashion is a conflict of interest?
>>
>>        Ingo
>
> Yikes - Ingo, I don't want to spawn a long thread here about what to
> call the list, but
> as a native English speaker, I think that "linux-trace-users" sounds
> much nicer than
> "linux-tracing-users".
>
> Perhaps, trace is an adjective describing the kind of users, in any
> case, it doesn't
> sound like "one trace" - so, could we go this one?
> (if you insist on linux-tracing then you have to drop the word "users")
>
> John
>

That's funny, boast about my credentials as a native English speaker, and then
make a mistake.

s/go this one/go with this one
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/