[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090923133735.dbe5dcec.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:37:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, aarcange@...hat.com, ieidus@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ksm: change default values to better fit into mainline
kernel
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:05:47 +0300
Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com> wrote:
> +static void __init ksm_init_max_kernel_pages(void)
> +{
> + ksm_max_kernel_pages = nr_free_buffer_pages() / 4;
> +}
> +
> static int __init ksm_slab_init(void)
> {
> rmap_item_cache = KSM_KMEM_CACHE(rmap_item, 0);
> @@ -1667,6 +1673,8 @@ static int __init ksm_init(void)
> struct task_struct *ksm_thread;
> int err;
>
> + ksm_init_max_kernel_pages();
Was it really worth creating a new function for this?
--- a/mm/ksm.c~ksm-change-default-values-to-better-fit-into-mainline-kernel-fix
+++ a/mm/ksm.c
@@ -184,11 +184,6 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ksm_mmlist_lock);
sizeof(struct __struct), __alignof__(struct __struct),\
(__flags), NULL)
-static void __init ksm_init_max_kernel_pages(void)
-{
- ksm_max_kernel_pages = nr_free_buffer_pages() / 4;
-}
-
static int __init ksm_slab_init(void)
{
rmap_item_cache = KSM_KMEM_CACHE(rmap_item, 0);
@@ -1673,7 +1668,7 @@ static int __init ksm_init(void)
struct task_struct *ksm_thread;
int err;
- ksm_init_max_kernel_pages();
+ ksm_max_kernel_pages = nr_free_buffer_pages() / 4;
err = ksm_slab_init();
if (err)
_
oh well, whatever.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists