[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090923215850.GA30818@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:58:50 -0400
From: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: fanotify as syscalls
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 08:35:18AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> The fear is that this becomes a trojan horse (no pun intended) for more
> and more hooks and "stuff", driven by we-really-need-this-too and
> we-really-need-that-too. And once something it's in, it's harder to say no,
> under the pressure of offering a "limited solution".
> This ws the reason I threw the syscall tracing thing in, so they have a
> low level generic hook, and they cam knock themselves out in their module
> (might need a few exports, but that's about it).
Replacing idiotify with a saner interface is a good goal. I just don't
think we should take the stakes of the snake oil industry too serious in
it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists