[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090924112838.33414fc6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:28:38 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Max Laier <max@...e2party.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: page_migration question
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:15 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Max Laier wrote:
>
> > I read Documentation/vm/page_migration but couldn't find the information I'm
> > looking for. Specifically, what locks am I supposed to hold/not hold while
> > calling migrate_prep() and migrate_pages()? Currently migrate_prep() seems to
> > deadlock for reasons beyond me. Any help appreciated.
>
> No locks need to be held while calling migrate prep. The pages to be
> migrated must have been isolated from the LRU and a refcount be taken for
> migrate_pages to work. Look at the implementation of sys_migratepages and
> sys_mbind and sys_movepages.
>
If you find migrate_prep() hangs, please check your other cpus are available to
run workqueue. It calls lru_add_drain_all()=>schedule_on_each_cpu().
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists