[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090924083309.GA14270@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:33:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> fs/proc/array.c between commit d899bf7b55f503ba7d3d07ed27c3a37e270fa7db
> ("procfs: provide stack information for threads") from Linus' tree and
> commit d01d4827858cdc2e1c437c87ab65ec0a00fd40f8 ("sched: Always show
> Cpus_allowed field in /proc/<pid>/status") from the tip tree.
>
> Just overlapping additions. I fixed it up (see below) and can cay the
> fix for a while. This appears to be fixed the same way in tip:master.
Thanks - that's how i fixed it up yesterday, and it tested fine. Have
just pushed out this resolution, so the conflict should disappear from
linux-next tomorrow.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists