[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090924155217.5ad0de4b@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:52:17 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC] page-writeback: move indoes from one superblock together
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:46:25 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Note that dirty_time may not be unique, so need some workaround. And
> the resulted rbtree implementation may not be more efficient than
> several list traversals even for a very large list (as long as
> superblocks numbers are low).
>
> The good side is, once sb+dirty_time rbtree is implemented, it should
> be trivial to switch the key to sb+inode_number (also may not be
> unique), and to do location ordered writeback ;)
would you want to sort by dirty time, or by inode number?
(assuming inode number is loosely related to location on disk)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists