linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] writeback: stop background writeback when below background threshold

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1253805536.18939.39.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:18:56 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
	shaohua.li@...el.com, chris.mason@...cle.com, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] writeback: stop background writeback when below
 background threshold

On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 17:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 16:40 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> > 
> > Treat bdi_start_writeback(0) as a special request to do background write,
> > and stop such work when we are below the background dirty threshold.
> > 
> > Also simplify the (nr_pages <= 0) checks. Since we already pass in
> > nr_pages=LONG_MAX for WB_SYNC_ALL and background writes, we don't
> > need to worry about it being decreased to zero.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
> > CC: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > ---
> 
> > @@ -720,20 +730,16 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> >  
> >  	for (;;) {
> >  		/*
> > +		 * Stop writeback when nr_pages has been consumed
> >  		 */
> > +		if (args->nr_pages <= 0)
> >  			break;
> >  
> >  		/*
> > +		 * For background writeout, stop when we are below the
> > +		 * background dirty threshold
> >  		 */
> > +		if (args->for_background && !over_bground_thresh())
> >  			break;
> 
> 
> What I'm not getting is why this is conditional on for_background(),
> shouldn't we always stop writeback when below the background threshold?

Ah, that would be for things like sync, which need to write out
everything, right?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/