linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ABBB4B2.7050404@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:04:34 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	"Ira W. Snyder" <iws@...o.caltech.edu>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, s.hetze@...ux-ag.com,
	alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/23/2009 10:37 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> Example: feature negotiation.  If it happens in userspace, it's easy
>> to limit what features we expose to the guest.  If it happens in the
>> kernel, we need to add an interface to let the kernel know which
>> features it should expose to the guest.  We also need to add an
>> interface to let userspace know which features were negotiated, if we
>> want to implement live migration.  Something fairly trivial bloats
>> rapidly.
> 
> btw, we have this issue with kvm reporting cpuid bits to the guest. 
> Instead of letting kvm talk directly to the hardware and the guest, kvm
> gets the cpuid bits from the hardware, strips away features it doesn't
> support, exposes that to userspace, and expects userspace to program the
> cpuid bits it wants to expose to the guest (which may be different than
> what kvm exposed to userspace, and different from guest to guest).
> 

This issue doesn't exist in the model I am referring to, as these are
all virtual-devices anyway.  See my last reply

-Greg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)