[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B0A7AF226B49A14897036E9B3A68CFFECB1AB0F79B@HQ-EXCH-7.corp.brocade.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:08:31 -0700
From: Jing Huang <huangj@...cade.COM>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
CC: "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Krishna Gudipati <kgudipat@...cade.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ramkumar Vadivelu <rvadivel@...cade.COM>,
Vinodh Ravindran <vravindr@...cade.COM>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/14] bfa: Brocade BFA FC SCSI driver (bfa1)
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I did run checkpatch.pl and it didn't report any ERROR or WARNING. Do
> you use any specific flags?
>
> No nothing special .. I run it in the following way,
>
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl this-is-the-test.patch
>
> or
>
> cat this-is-the-test.patch | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -
>
> how did you run it? Usually it will report something like the following
> if it finds nothing,
>
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, XXX lines checked
>
> Your patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
>
>
>
> Daniel
Thanks. I found the problem. I tried the latest checkpatch in 2.6.31 and it generates a lot of ERRORs about putting parentheses for return. I have been using an older version of checkpatch for patch submission all the time, and therefore I didn't see any problem. I will fix them and resubmit the patch.
Jing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists