linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.{30,31} x86_64 ahci problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200909242140.10174.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:40:08 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	Alexander Huemer <alexander.huemer@....ac.at>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.{30,31} x86_64 ahci problem - irq 23: nobody cared

On Thursday 24 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > error message from .31:
> >  [157152.418524] irq 23: nobody cared
>
> If no others reply and the issue can be reproduced reliably, running a
> git bisect between v2.6.29 and v2.6.30 to trace the cause of the
> regression could be an option.

Looking at the changes in drivers/ata/ahci.c, it might be worth to try if 
reverting the following commit fixes the issue:

commit a5bfc4714b3f01365aef89a92673f2ceb1ccf246
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Date:   Fri Jan 23 11:31:39 2009 +0900

    ahci: drop intx manipulation on msi enable

It's a bit of a wild guess though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/