lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090924204357.GB8662@nowhere>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:44:01 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] bkl tracepoints + filter regex support

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:30:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 22:16 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > There's one thing Peter noticed: this is not C syntax anymore. It would 
> > be really nice to keep filter expressions a subset of C.
> 
> Also:
> 
> > This patch provides basic support for regular expressions in filters.
> > 
> > It supports the following types of regexp:
> > 
> > - *match_beginning
> > - *match_middle*
> > - match_end*
> > - !don't match
> > 
> > Example:
> >         cd /debug/tracing/events/bkl/lock_kernel
> >         echo 'file == "*reiserfs*"' > filter
> >         echo 1 > enable
> 
> It says regex, but its not.
> 
> Regex would look like: "^.*reiserfs.*$", or simply "reiserfs"
> 
> What you implemented is called glob-matching.


Ouch, right...

 
> If you want to keep this C syntax, you could consider something like:
> 
>  glob_match(file, "*reiserfs*")
> 
> or something.
> 


I don't quite understand why.

Typing file == "*reiserfs*" looks more intuitive.

It's true that the filters should stay tight to the C syntax,
but following this guideline up to the point that we are forced to
use function expressions to do something that can be expressed
much more easily and more intuitively (IMHO), that all sounds like
an overkill.

The use of glob is a very primary need for filters, it's
so much a basic requirement for it that it should be native
in its language.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ