linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] MAINTAINERS cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090924144556.e743a5df.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:45:56 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	arjan@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] MAINTAINERS cleanups

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:12:18 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 20:59 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:41:48 -0700
> > Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > Yet another collection of MAINTAINERS cleanups
> > since all of this is to one file.. could you just make one big rollup
> > patch?
> 
> Sure, but individual patches to MAINTAINERS are better.
> 
> MAINTAINERS changes pretty quickly and the larger the patch,
> the more likely it won't apply correctly at any point in the
> future.

Yup, nanopatches to MAITNAINERS are much preferred, please.  It's
a rather high contention point!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/